1. Do you think the monster had other realistic options for dealing with his feelings of isolation and anger? Yes i think he had options, he is able to do what humans do so he could talk about his felings.
2. Up until this point there has been much "coincidence" that has lead the monster to Victor, for example, his finding Victor’s journal and happening to run into William in the woods. Mary Shelley has been criticized for relying too much on coincidence to advance the plot of this novel. Do you agree or disagree with this criticism? Explain your opinion. Yes and no there are some coincidences in the book but you can tack any thing realy as a coincidence realy.
3. Do you think Victor will comply with the monster’s request? Why or why not?
No i do not think victor will becaus he does not want to mack the same mistack twice.
4. Do you think Victor should comply with the monster’s request? Why or why not?
no i think it would creat more problems.
5. Do you think the monster is guilty of murder? Why or why not.
Yes he is guilty becaus he murdered wiliam.
6. Do you think that Victor is partly responsible for William’s death? If no, why not. If yes, what should be his punishment?
yes becaus he created the monster and if he dident william would be alive.
7. At this point in the book, do you think the monster is truly a monster? Explain your answer.
Yes becaus he has become a murder.
8. Do you excuse any of the monster’s actions because he was neglected by Victor and treated in such a cruel manner by other humans?
No there is no good reson to tack an innicont life.
9. Would you excuse another human being for his or her violent actions because he or she was previously neglected, abused, bullied or otherwise victimized? Why or why not.
No i would not.
10. Do you think that Mary Shelley intended this novel to be critical of mankind’s scientific advancements? What kind of a statement do you believe she might be making?
no i do not think she did. i think she just tried to wright a good book.
No comments:
Post a Comment